We haven’t hung in a long time, pretty much since getting barrels and other hard sided containers. The reasons not to hang in the article are true, although when we were able to hang food it was done properly. But it was time consuming, especially on a solo trip where I was moving campsite nearly every day, and in some places there was simply no appropriate limb available and the whole traverse rope and pulley system was overly time consuming.
So many reasons not to hang. The injury bit is another possibility, especially when trying to tie off throwing line to (less than perfect) rocks. There are alternatives to that, and better ways to throw (underhand, more vertically and close under the limb, flaking the line cleanly so it doesn’t snag and holding the line so that 6 or 8 feet is being tossed upwards at the same time instead of sprong-ing off the flaked pile immediately).
The arborist line throwing technique was new to me, but once I tried it the combined techniques it made perfect sense and much more accurate throws.
http://www.canoetripping.net/forums/for ... revelationI don’t buy much of advice offered regarding a rodent hang
“The concept of a so-called rodent hang is the same as a bear hang: suspend your food in the air, out of reach. But it’s simpler and less robust: it can be kept in camp, placed only a few feet off the ground, and needs to protect only against mice, squirrels, rabbits, raccoons, and maybe an occasional fox.
Unlike bear hangs, I advocate rodent hangs.”
Rodent hang
“As a substitute for a Ratsack or Ursack Minor, food can be successfully protected from rodents by hanging it. Keep it a few feet off the ground, a few feet from the trunk, and a few feet below the limb.
This is not a bear hang. An adult should be able to hang it and take it down without throwing a rope or standing on someone’s shoulders, and it can be set up a few feet from your shelter. To suspend it, use the drawstring on the food sack — or, better yet, add a length of heavy-duty fishing line, which rodent’s can’t climb.”
I’ll agree that “a few feet off the ground” can work for mice and raccoons (never had an issue with rabbits or fox going after food?), but squirrels are quite enterprising. But “A few feet off the ground” won’t cut it; we have a bird feeder on a shepherds crook with a squirrel cone. The cone is 6 feet in the air and the feeders well above that height. The cone preventer part works perfectly.
But the bottom of the feeder is (was) only 4 feet away diagonally from the top of a low railing nearby. The squirrels quickly became adept at leaping from that railing, up and out several feet, and grabbing the bottom of the feeder. They were not always successful, but they didn’t mind falling and would try, try again.
Squirrels can manage 3mm cord, maybe smaller. Mice too I am sure. Using the drawstring on a bag won’t stop them, and Monofilament seems like a PITA.
This rodent hang part needs to be taken with precautions “They’re perfect for bear-free areas, like most of the desert Southwest.” On one desert river trip a companion hung several dry bags with food from a conveniently horizontal, head high branch on a cottonwood.
The next morning his dry bags, including a nice Watershed bag, had holes crewed in them.
Maybe with an Ursack, but stuff bags and even dry bags won’t cut it.
I do still hang unburnable trash sometimes, depending on the days past menu, but that is hung is a 2 gallon gasket sealed Cur-tech drum.