View topic - Yukon Gov't wants to open Peel area to development!

It is currently September 18th, 2019, 12:15 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: February 15th, 2012, 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: June 22nd, 2004, 4:45 pm
Posts: 1215
Location: Canmore AB
In spite of all the recommendations to the contrary the Yukon Go'vt says it wants to allow industrial development in the Peel watershed.

http://yukon-news.com/news/27116/
"The Yukon government wants to allow industrial development in most of the Peel Watershed, Energy, Mines and Resources Minister Brad Cathers announced Tuesday.

“We see that as taking a balanced approach that shifts the debate from whether to protect the Peel, to how to protect the Peel,” said Cathers.

“Yukoners value wilderness beauty and healthy ecosystems, but also want a diversified economy that provides employment for their friends, family and community.”

Key areas would receive full protection, either through the creation of a park or special management area. That likely includes the Turner Lake wetlands and

“the confluence” of the Snake, Bonnet Plume and Wind rivers, said Cathers.

But “the majority” of the 68,000-sq.-kilometre watershed in northeast Yukon, would be open to development, he said.

That’s a big change from the planning commission’s recommendations to protect four-fifths of the watershed.

Miners that hope to dig up iron, coal and uranium in the region will be pleased. Conservationists are furious.

“They aren’t looking to the future and they certainly don’t respect all sectors of the economy,” said Karen Baltgailis, executive director of the Yukon Conservation Society, in a release.

“How are wilderness tourism and outfitting businesses supposed to coexist with industrial development in the Peel?” Baltgailis said.

Cathers wants to see a land-use plan for the Peel that resembles the one crafted for northern Yukon.

There, half the region is protected, with the remaining half open to a sliding scale of development, with stricter safeguards required for sensitive areas.

Similarly, the government wants to see in the Peel “active management of the landscape rather than prohibitions to use and access,” according to eight principles announced on Tuesday.

Cabinet hasn’t yet decided what percentage of the Peel it would like to see protected, said Cathers.

More details will be released when the government holds a final round of community consultations on the Peel plan later this year. A schedule is to be hammered out soon with affected First Nations, he said.

The government hopes to have a Peel plan signed off by the fall, said Cathers. That’s when a mineral staking ban for the Peel expires.

For that to happen, the territory and affected First Nations will need to broker a compromise. First Nations initially called for the entire watershed to be protected, and later endorsed the proposed plan.

Miners should be allowed to keep claims in the Peel, said Cathers. And they should be allowed to build “reasonable” access roads, he said.

Roads had been ruled out in the proposed plan, for fear they would spoil the region’s pristine character. Miners howled with indignation at this, saying that such a scheme would be tantamount to expropriation.

The Peel plan should also be amendable by the government to allow “for additional conservation or development,” according to the government’s principles.

And it shouldn’t cost too much.

“Ultimately, the plan must be one that can be implemented within fiscally responsible means and human resources capacity,” it states.

The Yukon Party government has, until now, said very little about what it wants to see done in the Peel, other than it thought the commission’s plan went too far.

Cathers denied there was anything amiss with the territory announcing its position only now.

“It’s a different step in the process,” he said.

Contact John Thompson at

johnt@yukon-news.com"

Hugh

_________________
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover."
M.T.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: February 16th, 2012, 8:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: June 22nd, 2004, 4:45 pm
Posts: 1215
Location: Canmore AB
Latest from the Whitehorse News.

http://www.whitehorsestar.com/archive/s ... n-on-peel/
"The government is choosing to ignore the final Peel plan and take matters into its own hands, say conservation groups, the NDP and even the former chair of the planning commission.

“I assumed all parties were providing us with what we needed to know,” David Loeks, who chaired the Peel Watershed Planning Commission since it was created in 2004 said today.

“This information was was never tabled to the commission.”

Loeks was referring to the set of eight principles for planning the Peel watershed the government released to the media and the four affected First Nations Tuesday.

Although the government claims the principles take a balanced approach, many are saying the new document is the first step toward opening the watershed to industrial development.

The Yukon Party government has been silent on whether it supports the final Peel plan, evading questions during the fall election and claiming it can’t take a stance until the whole planning process is complete.

Loeks is baffled the government chose to create these principles — which he thinks are closer to “objectives” — after the commission’s work has been completed.

He and the rest of the commission’s staff worked with a set of six guiding principles throughout the planning process, which included sustainable development, conservation and the precautionary principle.

“What they’re saying is we don’t really need a planning process, we’re going to do it on our own around a table with government people,” said Loeks.

The former chair said he thinks the government would throw out the commission’s final recommendations if it wasn’t legally bound to the process through the aboriginal land claim settlements

“They allowed us to get all the way through that without saying they fundamentally disagreed with the way we were doing things,” he continued.

When Loeks revealed the final blueprint last July — which again took a conservation approach and recommended that 80 per cent of the watershed be protected — he spoke of frustrations while working with the government.

The government said it wanted more balance but was not specific as to where and why, Loeks said at the time. He believes the commission “more or less got it right” in the 2010 recommendation.

Elaine Schiman, a spokesperson for cabinet, stressed today that the government in no way is rejecting the final Peel plan, as media reports have recently suggested.

“We are modifying it,” she said.

Energy, Mines and Resources Minister Brad Cathers, told the Star Monday these principles will help Yukoners find common ground. He said they are meant to guide the plan’s modification and the upcoming rounds of public consultation.

The Liberals are applauding the government for getting the ball rolling, but are concerned about the origins of the new principles.

“My question is, where did they come from?” Darius Elias, interim Liberal leader, said this morning.

“What the Yukon Party government’s written reasons are to modify the plan, and to what extent, better be good,” he continued. “If they’re not, I predict a swift and remarkable public outcry.”

Elias is particularly concerned about two principles that focus on managing intensity of use instead of prohibiting it.

“Those are in a totally different direction from what the commission recommended,” he said.

He believes the Peel planning process is far from being over and Cathers’ goal of having it wrapped up is “pretty ambitious”.

The NDP is taking a more aggressive approach to the government’s latest announcement.

Party leader Liz Hanson called it a “frontal assault” on the territory and one that threatens the fundamental faith Yukoners have in their government.

She said when the Peel planning process began, both First Nations and the Yukon government committed to sustainable development as a main principle.

“Not once does the government speak of sustainability (in its new principles),” Hanson continued.

“To say after almost eight years ‘You know we don’t like it, we want to tell you what the rules are’, — that’s just the old bully-boy approach.”

Hanson said it’s clear the government has no intention of fulfilling its obligations under the land claim agreements.

The Yukon Conservation Society (YCS) and Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS) Yukon chapter were singing the same tune at a press conference yesterday.

“Now we know why the Yukon Party has never clearly expressed its vision for the Peel, either to the public or the Peel commission. It doesn’t have a vision. It wants business as usual, and it thinks it can do what it wants to in the Peel, anyway,” said Mike Dehn, executive director of CPAWS.

Karen Baltgailis, YCS’s executive director, said that if the government didn’t like the commission’s principles, it had plenty of time to object.

“Let’s be frank. What the government wants to do is gut seven years of hard work, collaboration and compromise to open the Peel to industrial development,” she said.

Chiefs from the four affected First Nations were told of the principles in a meeting with the government Tuesday. The First Nations have not yet commented on the government’s announcement."

Hugh

_________________
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover."
M.T.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: February 29th, 2012, 4:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: June 22nd, 2004, 4:45 pm
Posts: 1215
Location: Canmore AB
There appears to be a lot of folks from CCR heading up to YT this summer.
If you are paddling the Peel drainage ( Wind, Snake, Bonnet Plume) or anywhere in YT, this should be of interest to you.
A Woman in Whitehorse has taken it upon herself to challenge the YT Gov't's stance.

http://www.yukon-news.com/news/27377/

It's worth the read.
Hugh

_________________
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover."
M.T.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: February 29th, 2012, 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: June 20th, 2001, 7:00 pm
Posts: 418
Location: Wellington ON
Thanks for this Hugh ......

I was on the Wind & Peel in 2009 and hope to return to the watershed in the future.

I'll be on the Thirty Mile / Yukon this year.

Grassroots lobbying has a history of often having very positive results - I wish this young lady all the best.

_________________
[url]http://LOAFin-Around.blogspot.ca[/url]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: December 15th, 2015, 9:36 am 
Offline
CCR Assistant Administrator
User avatar

Joined: January 20th, 2003, 7:00 pm
Posts: 12090
Location: Simcoe County, Ontario
First Nations, environmental groups to provide update on Peel case

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/pee ... -1.3365220



Barbara

_________________
I'm out of bed and I made it to the keyboard....what more do you want?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group