Erhard, this news report today states that Transcanada's tar sands pipeline conversion, if it is approved, will pass through Northern Ontario and then down the Ottawa valley, connecting western producers with eastern refineries, see map. The Enbridge pipeline connection with Sarnia was not mentioned. It seems thousands of km of new pipeline will replace the previous one designed to move natural gas.
Maybe the oil industry is anticipating the protests and problems if tar sands oil is piped through Toronto, and the Harper government isn't ready to accept those political consequences in lost votes.
Quote:
TransCanada moves forward with west-east pipeline
Calgary company's proposed pipeline would carry crude oil from Western Canada to Saint John
CBC News
Posted: Aug 1, 2013 8:47 AM AT Last Updated: Aug 1, 2013 10:08 AM AT
Calgary-based TransCanada Corp. plans to move forward with its proposed Energy East Pipeline project, the company said today.
The pipeline proposal, which still needs regulatory approval, will send 1.1 million barrels of oil per day from Western Canada to refineries and export terminals in Eastern Canada.
The company said in a news release it received “strong market support” during its open season process, during which interested producers were asked to make binding commitments for space on the pipeline.
"We are very pleased with the outcome of the open season for the Energy East Pipeline held earlier this year and are excited to move forward with a major project that will bring many benefits across Canada," said Russ Girling, TransCanada's president and chief executive officer, said in a news release on Thursday.
"This is an historic opportunity to connect the oil resources of Western Canada to the consumers of Eastern Canada, creating jobs, tax revenue and energy security for all Canadians for decades to come."
New Brunswick Premier David Alward has been a strong advocate for the proposed west-east TransCanada pipeline project. (CBC)The pipeline project is expected to cost $12 billion, excluding the transfer value of Canadian Mainline natural gas assets, according to the company.
TransCanada is proposing to convert roughly 3,000 kilometres of natural gas pipeline on its existing Canadian Mainline route so it can carry crude oil.
The company would also construct 1,400 kilometres of new pipeline to carry crude oil into Saint John, where it will end at the Canaport LNG terminal.
The Irving Oil Ltd. refinery in Saint John is the largest in Canada and can process 300,000 barrels of oil per day. Saint John also has a deep-water port and a liquefied natural gas facility.
TransCanada and Irving Oil Ltd. have also formed a joint venture to build and operate a new deep water marine terminal, according to the corporate statement.
The company said it would start seeking regulatory approvals on the pipeline in 2014 and the oil could start flowing to Eastern Canada by late 2017.
New Brunswick Premier David Alward and Alberta Premier Alison Redford have been outspoken advocates for the pipeline.
Redford said in a statement on Thursday morning the pipeline project will create co-operation among provinces to get Canadian oil into international markets.
“This is truly a nation-building project that will diversify our economy and create new jobs here in Alberta and across the country,” Redford said in a statement.
New Brunswick’s premier also used the pipeline company’s announcement to talk about the importance of provincial co-operation.
"This is a game-changer and a historic moment for our province as well as our friends and partners from coast to coast to coast," Alward said in a statement.
"Together, we are seizing an unprecedented opportunity to create jobs for our workers, build a stronger economic foundation for communities, and fund the education, health care and social programs that families deserve."
Federal Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver has said the pipeline is in the national interest.
Regulatory approval
The company said it would start seeking regulatory approvals on the pipeline in 2014, and the oil could start flowing to Eastern Canada by late 2017 in Quebec and 2018 in New Brunswick.
The National Energy Board is responsible for approving pipelines.
Alberta Premier Alison Redford travelled to New Brunswick in June to pitch the pipeline project to politicians and business leaders. (CBC)Despite TransCanada’s push to move forward with the eastern pipeline, the company’s president said others, such as the Keystone XL pipeline, are needed.
"Energy East is one solution for transporting crude oil but the industry also requires additional pipelines such as Keystone XL to transport growing supplies of Canadian and U.S. crude oil to existing North American markets," Girling said in a statement.
"Both pipelines are required to meet the need for safe and reliable pipeline infrastructure and are underpinned with binding, long-term agreements."
Keystone XL would carry millions of barrels of oilsands bitumen a week through six U.S. states to Gulf Coast refineries.
Environmental checks promised
The Keystone pipeline proposal has been met by political and environmental opposition in the United States.
In New Brunswick, Alward said he wants to ensure the pipeline is built to the “highest environmental standards" as it passes through the province.
"Our First Nations leaders will be with us every step of the way as we work to maximize the benefits and opportunities for our First Nations communities, while ensuring the highest environmental and safety standards are followed," Alward’s statement said.
"This project can and will be done safely or not at all."
The project has the possibility of creating 2,000 jobs during the construction phase of the pipeline and a few hundred refining jobs after, according to some estimates from the New Brunswick government.
Alberta has been interested in the project, because oil from that province is now being shipped to the United States, where there is a glut. That means oil producers are getting $20 to $40 less per barrel than the world price.
Those lower prices translate into lower royalties for the provincial government, and that is causing a potential multibillion-dollar deficit in Alberta. A pipeline to the Irving Oil refinery would allow Alberta producers to charge the higher world price.
The Alberta Petroleum Marketing Association, a Crown corporation, has already pledged to move up to 100,000 barrels a day for 20 years on the proposed TransCanada Corp project. The commitment is worth $5 billion.
The New Brunswick government has said it will not subsidize the pipeline.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-bruns ... t-842.html